hdb has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:
Background: In the recent thread help with simplifying program, BillKSmith recommended the use of <Algorithm::Combinatorics>. This uses iterators to go through combinations of data. I love to write terse code so I ended up with (which I did not post in the original thread):
use strict; use warnings; use Algorithm::Combinatorics qw(combinations); my $rep = 5; # should be 100 my @data = 0..$rep; my $iter = combinations( \@data, 4 ); while( my ( $z, $y, $x, $w ) = @{ $iter->next // last } ) { next unless $w-2*$x+$y or $x-2*$y+$z; print "$w, $x, $y, $z\n"; }
My question is about the // last part. I reads nicely like "next or last" but I am aware that this exit from the while loop makes while redundant. I might as well use goto or write
while(1){ my ( $z, $y, $x, $w ) = @{ $iter->next // last }; ... }
What do you think about this use of last here? Is it a nice short way of exiting the loop when the iterator becomes undef when exhausted or is this breaking too much of the loop's structure? Or are there even hidden dangers that I have not spotted?
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Unconventional exit from while loop
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on May 24, 2013 at 18:40 UTC | |
Re: Unconventional exit from while loop
by tobyink (Canon) on May 24, 2013 at 19:01 UTC | |
Re: Unconventional exit from while loop
by LanX (Saint) on May 24, 2013 at 21:56 UTC | |
Re: Unconventional exit from while loop
by Laurent_R (Canon) on May 24, 2013 at 22:04 UTC | |
Re: Unconventional exit from while loop
by hdb (Monsignor) on May 26, 2013 at 08:15 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on May 26, 2013 at 13:46 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on May 26, 2013 at 14:12 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on May 26, 2013 at 14:19 UTC | |
by hdb (Monsignor) on May 26, 2013 at 14:17 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on May 26, 2013 at 14:21 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on May 26, 2013 at 12:59 UTC |