RE: RE: how many levels of 'RE:' do we need :-)

as someone somewhere already suggested, Re(3): or similar would look much better than Re:Re:Re:

Comment on RE: RE: how many levels of 'RE:' do we need :-)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: RE: how many levels of 'RE:' do we need :-) by BigJoe (Curate) on May 18, 2000 at 05:34 UTC
Or you could do a RE(username): subject where the user name is the author of the comment you are replying to.	[reply]
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: how many levels of 'RE:' do we need :-) by perlmonkey (Hermit) on May 18, 2000 at 05:48 UTC
Your idea has my vote. I like Re(BigJoe): Subject or combining the two, you can do Re(BigJoe,3): Subject	[reply]
Re^13: how many levels of 'RE:' do we need :-) by demerphq (Chancellor) on Nov 02, 2005 at 19:23 UTC
The title of this node shows how we finally decided to handle this. --- $world=~s/war/peace/g	[reply]