in reply to Re^2: On the rejected additions to List::Util
in thread On the rejected additions to List::Util
What are legitimate reasons to put it in List::Util?
Caution: Contents may have been coded under pressure.
Having List::Utils, List::MoreUtils, List::EvenMoreUtils, List::SomeMoreUtilsByMe, List::AnotherCoupleUtilsTheyForgot, etc. seems like it might be a Bad Thing. Better to have basic list utilities in one List::Utils module, I think. And the reason they're not included? They're "too basic".
It's a perfectly good reason to include them in List::Util. It's not an absolute mandate that they be included, but it is a reason.
Caution: Contents may have been coded under pressure.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^4: On the rejected additions to List::Util
by Anonymous Monk on Apr 28, 2009 at 20:51 UTC | |
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Apr 29, 2009 at 15:04 UTC |
In Section
Meditations