go ahead... be a heretic PerlMonks

Re^4: Where should (or could) a distribution override HARNESS_OPTIONS? (use Inline works like this)

 on Nov 23, 2012 at 06:28 UTC ( #1005217=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

"build" refers to Inline creating a module in _Inline (like h2xs) and making it at use/BEGIN time (perl Makefile.PL/make install), before your program runs, ex

subsequent runs don't "build"

unless the c-source changes

The resulting directory structure

The _Inline/build directory usually gets cleaned up, but not for notdef.pl

notdef.pl also NAME's the module, so its name doesn't change, but def.pl doesn't NAME the module, so a name is derived from the filename (def.pl) and the md5 sum of the c-source code

$cat _Inline\lib\auto\def_pl_4ff5\def_pl_4ff5.inl md5 : 4ff5a29496365b6167324b7d80efb321 name : def_pl_4ff5 version : "" language : C language_id : C installed : 0 date_compiled : Thu Nov 22 21:58:12 2012 inline_version : 0.5 ILSM : % module : Inline::C suffix : dll type : compiled Config : % apiversion : ? archname : MSWin32-x86-multi-thread cc : gcc ccflags : " -s -O2 -DWIN32 -DPERL_TEXTMODE_SCRIPTS -DPERL_IMPLICI +T_CONTEXT -DPERL_IMPLICIT_SYS -fno-strict-aliasing -mms-bitfields" ld : g++ osname : MSWin32 osvers : 5.1 so : dll version : 5.14.1 [download] Now, can two copies of notdef.pl run simultaneously? Lets see First cleanup$ rm -rfv _Inline

And one copy will trip over the other and die , the other will continue normally

Now I'm not sure what scenario davido is talking about in the OP, but I hope this helps

FWIW, def.pl/notdef.pl are derived from XS: returning a 64-bit unsigned int?/Re: Inline::C with multiple *.c

• Comment on Re^4: Where should (or could) a distribution override HARNESS_OPTIONS? (use Inline works like this)

Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1005217]
help
Chatterbox?
 [erix]: hard to implement, hmm [Corion]: erix: Well, they also seem to have changed the server, or some software, or whatever, and seem to be in the process of changing the DB schema from having the "username" as primary key to something else. [Corion]: Far too many things being done at once, or maybe only now has it become apparent that nobody knows that piece of software anymore [marto]: good morning all [Corion]: I consider having an abstract key as userid in your system good, because the "real" company-wide (or even larger) user id will likely not fit your criteria well [Corion]: A good morning marto!

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (10)
As of 2017-01-23 09:38 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
Voting Booth?
Do you watch meteor showers?

Results (192 votes). Check out past polls.