>perl switchtest.pl 2> NUL

====== Benchmark for 63.6% match rate (Count=  10)===
Benchmark: timing 10000 iterations of HashSub, if, switch...
   HashSub:  1 wallclock secs ( 0.52 usr +  0.10 sys =  0.62 CPU) @ 16129.03/s (
n=10000)
        if:  0 wallclock secs ( 0.41 usr +  0.09 sys =  0.50 CPU) @ 19960.08/s (
n=10000)
    switch:  6 wallclock secs ( 5.64 usr +  0.12 sys =  5.76 CPU) @ 1736.71/s (n
=10000)

====== Benchmark for 33.3% match rate (Count=  20)===
Benchmark: timing 10000 iterations of HashSub, if, switch...
   HashSub:  1 wallclock secs ( 0.92 usr +  0.22 sys =  1.14 CPU) @ 8756.57/s (n
=10000)
        if:  1 wallclock secs ( 0.81 usr +  0.15 sys =  0.96 CPU) @ 10395.01/s (
n=10000)
    switch: 18 wallclock secs (17.04 usr +  0.34 sys = 17.38 CPU) @ 575.24/s (n=
10000)

====== Benchmark for 22.6% match rate (Count=  30)===
Benchmark: timing 10000 iterations of HashSub, if, switch...
   HashSub:  1 wallclock secs ( 1.39 usr +  0.28 sys =  1.67 CPU) @ 5980.86/s (n
=10000)
        if:  2 wallclock secs ( 1.03 usr +  0.38 sys =  1.41 CPU) @ 7077.14/s (n
=10000)
    switch: 29 wallclock secs (28.98 usr +  0.49 sys = 29.47 CPU) @ 339.29/s (n=
10000)

====== Benchmark for 17.1% match rate (Count=  40)===
Benchmark: timing 10000 iterations of HashSub, if, switch...
   HashSub:  3 wallclock secs ( 1.73 usr +  0.47 sys =  2.20 CPU) @ 4541.33/s (n
=10000)
        if:  1 wallclock secs ( 1.51 usr +  0.36 sys =  1.87 CPU) @ 5339.03/s (n
=10000)
    switch: 42 wallclock secs (41.10 usr +  0.66 sys = 41.76 CPU) @ 239.46/s (n=
10000)

====== Benchmark for 13.7% match rate (Count=  50)===
Benchmark: timing 10000 iterations of HashSub, if, switch...
   HashSub:  3 wallclock secs ( 2.29 usr +  0.44 sys =  2.73 CPU) @ 3658.98/s (n
=10000)
        if:  2 wallclock secs ( 1.94 usr +  0.38 sys =  2.32 CPU) @ 4302.93/s (n
=10000)
    switch: 54 wallclock secs (52.90 usr +  0.66 sys = 53.56 CPU) @ 186.72/s (n=
10000)

====== Benchmark for 11.5% match rate (Count=  60)===
Benchmark: timing 10000 iterations of HashSub, if, switch...
   HashSub:  3 wallclock secs ( 2.55 usr +  0.71 sys =  3.27 CPU) @ 3062.79/s (n
=10000)
        if:  3 wallclock secs ( 2.35 usr +  0.43 sys =  2.78 CPU) @ 3591.95/s (n
=10000)
    switch: 66 wallclock secs (64.62 usr +  0.90 sys = 65.52 CPU) @ 152.62/s (n=
10000)

====== Benchmark for 9.9% match rate (Count=  70)===
Benchmark: timing 10000 iterations of HashSub, if, switch...
   HashSub:  4 wallclock secs ( 3.06 usr +  0.74 sys =  3.80 CPU) @ 2634.35/s (n
=10000)
        if:  3 wallclock secs ( 2.63 usr +  0.61 sys =  3.24 CPU) @ 3082.61/s (n
=10000)
    switch: 78 wallclock secs (76.56 usr +  0.89 sys = 77.45 CPU) @ 129.11/s (n=
10000)

====== Benchmark for 8.6% match rate (Count=  80)===
Benchmark: timing 10000 iterations of HashSub, if, switch...
   HashSub:  4 wallclock secs ( 3.52 usr +  0.79 sys =  4.32 CPU) @ 2316.96/s (n
=10000)
        if:  4 wallclock secs ( 3.04 usr +  0.66 sys =  3.70 CPU) @ 2699.06/s (n
=10000)
    switch: 89 wallclock secs (88.21 usr +  1.31 sys = 89.52 CPU) @ 111.71/s (n=
10000)

====== Benchmark for 7.7% match rate (Count=  90)===
Benchmark: timing 10000 iterations of HashSub, if, switch...
   HashSub:  5 wallclock secs ( 3.96 usr +  0.89 sys =  4.85 CPU) @ 2063.13/s (n
=10000)
        if:  5 wallclock secs ( 3.39 usr +  0.77 sys =  4.17 CPU) @ 2400.38/s (n
=10000)
    switch: 101 wallclock secs (100.08 usr +  1.37 sys = 101.46 CPU) @ 98.56/s (
n=10000)

>