in reply to Constructive thoughts on Dancer2 v Mojolicious
are all things equal between these two frameworks
I don't use either of them. Now and again I go back and have another look as many fellow monks are wont to rave about one or the other but neither has yet enticed me enough to dive in. That said there are clearly some differences between them and that may or may not influence a decision to go with one or the other. It depends largely on which attributes you deem most important.
| Dancer2 | Mojolicious | |
|---|---|---|
| Non-core direct deps | 28 | none |
| Open issues | 106 | 46 |
| Issues resolved this year | 13 | 29 |
| Metacpan ++ | 115 (47 PAUSErs) | 427 (181 PAUSErs) |
| Last release | 27th May | 3rd June |
| Non-dev releases this year | 4 | 17 |
| Test coverage | 84% | 90% |
| Kwalitee | 150 (96.88 core) | 156.25 (96.88 core) |
| Reverse deps (direct) | 168 (148) | 964 (858) |
| Licence | As Perl | Artistic 2 |
Numbers correct at time of posting (E&OE). No doubt you can pick other metrics of importance to you. Given the recent releases from both, comparing the smoke tester pass/fail ratio seemed not to be useful (and they both have good records there anyway).
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom