in reply to XML namespace question

Will somebody (else) please just post a nice, definitive answer to this person’s original question?

I believe that the problem is that the xmlns= clause is being recognized and therefore any XPath expressions which do not refer to it, refer to an empty namespace (which does not occur in this document because a non-empty global namespace has been specified).   I see that TobyInk’s example retrieves that namespace, assigns it to a more-convenient alias ("x"), and then expressly refers to it in every search.   (And, I suspect, this is the real magic ... not "//" vs. "./" as I originally thought and suggested.   The use of an alias, I believe, is merely practical shorthand.)

It’s more than a little bit embarrassing, on behalf of PerlMonks as a site, when the reaction seen within a thread is for Monks to piss on one-another instead of ... simply providing a direct answer.   Not a snarky list of books-to-read, not a thing to decipher.   A helpful answer.   And, if one answer turns out to be wrong (as I now believe mine was), a simple correction.   We really don’t want people to get better answers, and to be treated in a more civilized way, next-door on StackExchange ...

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: XML namespace question
by Anonymous Monk on Oct 08, 2015 at 21:51 UTC

    Will somebody (else) please just post a nice, definitive answer to this personís original question?

    Why do you keep spamming the OP with requests for somebody else?