http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=1215627


in reply to Re: Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?
in thread Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?

So essentially, yes or no and explain in a reply why?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?
by shmem (Chancellor) on Jun 01, 2018 at 13:17 UTC

    Essentially, yes. Since there's only 'yes' and 'no' and people are generally too lazy to explain why they choose either, some common arguments would help them to explain without needing to do so, and make those more specific answers countable.

    At PerlMonks, we can comment; but in e.g. political polls questions are often carefully crafted to steer away from the reasons for consent or rejection (which of course isn't your intention here). In this poll, the interesting thing is not 'if', but 'why ·/· whynot' and what could be done about that - i.e. what is the reason with most weight for either choice.

    perl -le'print map{pack c,($-++?1:13)+ord}split//,ESEL'