http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=286164


in reply to Re: Re: Re: Software Design Resources
in thread Software Design Resources

That sounds interesting: it seems like they did EM to estimate the coefficients of an infinite-term polynomial (hmm, it couldn't *really* have been infinite, so either the polynomial converged or they just took many millions of terms). Once they believed they had modeled the rate of bug-discovery as a function of time they just solved the equation for bug-discovery = 0. As you imply, actually finding the roots of a polynomial that large would be too challenging, so they just scanned forward in time until they found the first (+ve) root.

Just guessing, but that seems a reasonable approach to do what you're describing. Does that sound about right?

  • Comment on Re: Re: Re: Re: Software Design Resources

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Software Design Resources
by BrowserUk (Pope) on Aug 24, 2003 at 11:58 UTC

    To the level that I understand (and remember), that seems a perfect decription:)


    Examine what is said, not who speaks.
    "Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham
    "When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong." -Richard Buckminster Fuller
    If I understand your problem, I can solve it! Of course, the same can be said for you.