in reply to RE (tilly) 3: sort performance
in thread sort performance

When faced with the ridiculous, look for the obvious. If you change all three to use the same kind of sort, Schwartz runs faster than the other two.


(Stupid user tricks.)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE (tilly) 4: sort performance
by tye (Sage) on Sep 12, 2000 at 08:01 UTC

    I get "schartz" 5%-30% faster than "straight" with "tye" (which you didn't time) being 50%-100% faster still (all using "cmp"). (:

            - tye (but my friends call me "Tye")