http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=815524


in reply to Re: $SIG{ALRM} and windows vista?
in thread $SIG{ALRM} and windows vista?

Not true.

$ perl 815492.pl Enter your password: You timed out.

Signals for which there is a handler will interrupt I/O operations (at the OS level) even under safe signals. readline returns (with errno = EINTR) as soon as the signal is received, allowing the signal handler to be called within milliseconds even under safe signals.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: $SIG{ALRM} and windows vista?
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 04, 2010 at 06:56 UTC

    Not on my Vista system.


    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

      It sounds like you're saying that signals don't interrupt I/O on Windows, but you know that only thing that Windows has that is similar to signals are Ctrl-C and Ctrl-Break. Are you saying they don't interrupt I/O? I haven't tested how they work.

      Update: Clarified.

        Windows doesn't have signals

        No, but it simulates some of them:

        use strict; use warnings; use 5.010; print 'Enter your password: '; my $password = eval { local $SIG{ALRM} = sub {die "timeout\n"}; alarm 5; # return <STDIN>; sleep 10; }; alarm 0; if ($@ =~ /timeout/) { print "You timed out.\n"; } __END__ [ 7:18:01.22] C:\test>alarmit.pl Enter your password: You timed out.

        Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
        "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
        In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.