in reply to Re^5: The current state of Perl6
in thread The current state of Perl6
Did you notice that yourself and I, we both like to be anonymous. It is because the reaction to this kind of topic in any Perl community is nearing some sort of flamewar or in any case something of big proportions.
This is not supposed to happen normally, because you just come with an honest question but people keep on giving dishonest answers, or politically correct answers such as depends on your definition of "production-ready" or lame stuff like for most definitions of "production-ready".
That's really dishonest and it annoys me a lot and I'm sure it annoys you too.
I do appreciate the fact that you are honest Anonymous Monk :)
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^7: The current state of Perl6
by CountZero (Bishop) on Apr 19, 2010 at 17:55 UTC | |
Re^7: The current state of Perl6
by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Apr 19, 2010 at 16:39 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Apr 19, 2010 at 16:57 UTC | |
by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Apr 19, 2010 at 17:15 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Apr 20, 2010 at 10:15 UTC | |
by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Apr 20, 2010 at 16:31 UTC | |
| |
Re^7: The current state of Perl6
by Anonymous Monk on Apr 19, 2010 at 15:57 UTC | |
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in. |
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom