in reply to Who gave (and continues to give) Tye his authority for his autocratic domination of PerlMonks?
And if so, should we -- collectively, the constant, responsive, backbone of PerlMonks - continue to accept his caprice over how, and why, and what, and when, happens and is possible, and should be acceptable, here at the Monastery?
Yes: {}; No: {}; Don't know: {X}; Don't care: {}
Instead of choosing every option I chose Don't know
I've been there... I've chosen to be free from XP/chatterbox... if a simple new question button can't gain traction what will? font changes naturally :)
Bigger Textarea, How can one enlarge the "Your question box"? (via CSS for textarea of new question )
other ideas i've had RFC - new shortform for newquestions with anysection dropdown/selection/option, RFC new question nodelet proposal (postshortcuts, newquestion, oneclickpostlinks, noscrollnewpost)
So you're shaking the box and the results are predictable :)
If not tye then who?
If not status-quo then what?
Not-breaking perlmonks beats improving stuff, I guess ... How does perlmonks work? What is perlmonks timeline for work?
Should I just start mocking up a perlmonks clone like perlknights only using mojo?
Oooh, developing via https://gist.github.com/ gives an everything kind of experience :)
BTW, 1st VOTE, WOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOo i'm tired :)
|
|---|