in reply to Shouldn't LITERAL references be readonly? (updated)
The {} and [] operators construct new aggregates each time they are evaluated. Why should those values be readonly? They are not literals.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^2: Shouldn't references be readonly?
by LanX (Saint) on Aug 05, 2020 at 02:01 UTC | |
by Fletch (Bishop) on Aug 05, 2020 at 02:27 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on Aug 05, 2020 at 13:40 UTC | |
by chromatic (Archbishop) on Aug 05, 2020 at 17:28 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on Aug 05, 2020 at 17:32 UTC | |
by jcb (Parson) on Aug 05, 2020 at 21:43 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on Aug 05, 2020 at 21:50 UTC | |
by jcb (Parson) on Aug 05, 2020 at 22:13 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on Aug 05, 2020 at 22:21 UTC | |
Re^2: Shouldn't references be readonly?
by LanX (Saint) on Aug 05, 2020 at 19:13 UTC | |
by jcb (Parson) on Aug 05, 2020 at 21:48 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on Aug 05, 2020 at 21:56 UTC | |
by hippo (Bishop) on Aug 05, 2020 at 22:07 UTC | |
by jcb (Parson) on Aug 05, 2020 at 22:01 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on Aug 05, 2020 at 22:11 UTC | |
|
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom