http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=137644


in reply to use Fatal;

This sounds like a Good Thing (tm) - cuts down on typing / file size (marginally, but it all helps) and more importantly makes sure I don't forget to do the error checking.

Looking at the docs, it looks admirably flexible:

C<Fatal> provides a way to conveniently replace functions which normally return a false value when they fail with equivalents which halt execution if they are not successful.

As I read it, this means if I have a function 'foo' that sometimes returns false, and I'd like to know about that for test purposes, say, I can do import Fatal 'foo'; Thus where I have
use Fatal; import Fatal 'foo'; sub foo { my $test = rand; return $test if $test > .5; } my $test = foo(); print $test;
Each time rand is less than .5, I get
Can't foo(), $! is "No such file or directory" at (eval 1) line 3 main::__ANON__() called at p.pl line 10
... which is better than nothing.

The only reason I can think of for doing my own error checking is so that I can supply my own useful info about the failure. So for example I probably wouldn't use this for error-checking DBI function calls, because I would want to add $dbh->errstr.

Thanks for drawing attention to this.

§ George Sherston

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
(cLive ;-) Re: use Fatal;
by cLive ;-) (Prior) on Jan 10, 2002 at 05:20 UTC
    Actually, DBI is where I was thinking of bringing it in, combined with a custom $SIG{__DIE__}, eg:
    local $SIG{__die__} = sub { die ("DBI Error: $DBI::errstr") if $DBI::errstr; die $!; };
    But make sure you explicitly refer to the error (ie, don't use OO method unless method will definitely be in scope in the sub).

    Could be very useful...

    cLive ;-)

      No need to use fatal with DBI. Just set DBI's RaiseError flag to true. You can even use eval() to catch exceptions with it.