http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=390512


in reply to Re: The Scriptorium impact on the Titlebar and the Front page (patients)
in thread The Scriptorium impact on the Titlebar and the Front page

I like "Site Scriptorium" more than "Inner Scriptorium" personally. It goes with the "Site Manuscript" designation used elsewhere a bit better I think.

Having said that, perhaps the other designation should just be "Internal Manuscript"


---
demerphq

    First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
    -- Gandhi

    Flux8


  • Comment on Re^2: The Scriptorium impact on the Titlebar and the Front page (patients)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: The Scriptorium impact on the Titlebar and the Front page (patients)
by jacques (Priest) on Sep 13, 2004 at 12:59 UTC
    "Inner" seems more appropriate than "Site". But Scriptorium sounds like a bad Metallica song.

      Were there any good Metallica songs? ;-)


      ---
      demerphq

        First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
        -- Gandhi

        Flux8


        IMO, the PerlMonks Scriptorium sounds more like the one from "The Name of the Rose", and old now but still excellent movie from Umberto Eco with Sean Connery.

        OT: I think Dead Can Dance 1st albums would more fit here than Metallica ;)

        By the way: when writing here the pmdevtopic note isn't counted as a writeup...

        ____
        HTH, Dominique
        My two favorites:
        If the only tool you have is a hammer, you will see every problem as a nail. --Abraham Maslow
        Bien faire, et le faire savoir...

Re^3: The Scriptorium impact on the Titlebar and the Front page (patients)
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Sep 14, 2004 at 21:11 UTC

    I like “Inner Scriptorium” better.

    “Site Scriptorium” suggests that the section is somehow related to the use of the site, which is not the case.

    Makeshifts last the longest.