http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=62421


in reply to Re: (jptxs)Re: Perl is psychic?!
in thread Perl is psychic?!

Whoever voted down the above node completely missed the point. MrNobo1024 is completely correct in saying that if Perl worked as documented as far back as, say, Camel 2 then it should not have had enough information to calculate $&.