http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=654408


in reply to Re: ActivePerl 5.10.0 Beta out
in thread ActivePerl 5.10.0 Beta out

I personally believe that your concerns are understandable: I used to link directly to the youtube clip, and I've been accused of "youtube spamming." I'm now linking to that entry in my tumblelog, which if nothing else provides an explanation. And I'm not stopping this IPB thing anytime soon: call it a one-man-meme if you like. It's just a little toying...

  • Comment on OT: IPB (was: Re^2: ActivePerl 5.10.0 Beta out)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: OT: IPB (was: Re^2: ActivePerl 5.10.0 Beta out)
by Arunbear (Prior) on Dec 02, 2007 at 16:04 UTC
    Littering the monastery with hyperlinks that have nothing to do with the subjects being discussed is not the mature thing to do. Consider putting it in your signature - then at least it would be less distracting.

      I personally believe that as funny as it may seem, most (reasonable) people seemed not to have a problem with it. However I did never claim to be mature. Indeed I'm very immature, albeit in a very mature way. Anyway: partially following your suggestion, I'm casting the IPB incipit style in a form that will hopefully please most compulsive whiners too.

      --
      If you can't understand the incipit, then please check the IPB Campaign.
        I personally believe that as funny as it may seem, most (reasonable) people seemed not to have a problem with it.

        I, for one, am completely sick of reading it. If I could killfile you, I would.