Re: suggestions for placement of new user experience/feedback
I've placed some notes and things I didn't find in the tutorials in my home node. Some of which might be worth mining or - if not adding to a proper non-editable/non-commentable FAQ - adding to a PM-newbie thread as a comment:
Is there such a preferred node to add comments to - and I missed it - or is this indeed material for a full RFP medition as ww suggested via cb?
thanx, PeterUpdate: Actually I think that there are too many nodes adding some details to say the 2 major introduction texts. And now I added one more by using my home node to collect IMHO hard-to-find meta-information under the heading of Perlmonks - the missing Memes.
Concentrating such information say as footnotes in or RFC thread(s) for the main intros would have helped me a bit - it doesn't need to be fully integrated in the FAQs.
The main time-sinks examples in my case were:
- line wrapping in code section and the css scrap to get the textarea to have a sane width - not knowing where to look or even of their existance, those are way too easy to miss.
- finding the console scripts for use in xterms to edit nodes or use chatterbox (with the home work to patch them to make them work again on Unix).
- The chatterbox nodelet vs page reload after using the chatterbox is also a nice little newbie trap
If a reader of this finds the official thread for such comments, please /msg me about it -
I'd love to clean up my home node's meme section and move most of it to a well-linked official thread.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: q: is there a new user thread to add comments to?
by Corion (Patriarch) on Oct 01, 2009 at 07:02 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Oct 01, 2009 at 07:34 UTC | |
Re: q: is there a new user thread to add comments to?
by jakobi (Pilgrim) on Oct 01, 2009 at 09:38 UTC |