in reply to Re: Recursive substitution
in thread Recursive substitution
Thanks very much. I realised shortly after posting that I hadn't explained why I didn't want the most natural answer (current explanation: because I don't, that's why), but didn't update my post in time.
By the way, I think that s/$pat/$sub/ is (effectively) a no-op unless m/$pat/, so I think that it's redundant to do a separate m/$pat/ check.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^3: Recursive substitution
by bobf (Monsignor) on Nov 10, 2009 at 04:44 UTC |
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom