Re^4: In CGI::Application cgiapp_prerun vs. cgiapp

in reply to Re^3: In CGI::Application cgiapp_prerun vs. cgiapp_init?
in thread In CGI::Application cgiapp_prerun vs. cgiapp_init?

Ah, it's so blindingly obvious when you point it out, thanks for this. Of course I'm doing exactly what your first example shows, but not for long.

Comment on Re^4: In CGI::Application cgiapp_prerun vs. cgiapp_init?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: In CGI::Application cgiapp_prerun vs. cgiapp_init? (no reuse no run run ) by Anonymous Monk on Sep 08, 2013 at 21:04 UTC
Well, apparently, (I guesstimate) since (some time around) CGI::Application 3.x it is no longer recommended to reuse CGI::Application objects, no longer recommended to call run repeatedly, as Bug #72909 for CGI-Application: persistence issues says CGI::Application is designed to have a new object created on each request. which is an assumption various ::Plugins and extensions make, so its best to play along and not reuse an object and not ->run ->run ->run You probably discovered this on your own :)	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^5: In CGI::Application cgiapp_prerun vs. cgiapp_init? (no reuse no run run )
by Anonymous Monk on Sep 08, 2013 at 21:04 UTC

Well, apparently, (I guesstimate) since (some time around) CGI::Application 3.x it is no longer recommended to reuse CGI::Application objects, no longer recommended to call run repeatedly, as Bug #72909 for CGI-Application: persistence issues says CGI::Application is designed to have a new object created on each request. which is an assumption various ::Plugins and extensions make, so its best to play along and not reuse an object and not ->run ->run ->run

You probably discovered this on your own :)

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom