monkdiscuss
Anonymous Monk
<p> <b> So what is perlmonks definition of "personal attack" and "trolling"? Can a user lose his power to consider nodes? </b>
<p> Being [Anonymous Monk] can be hard, consider these reapings which according to posted rules should not have been reaped
<p> <readmore>
<p> [id://1036542]
Reason: [LanX]: reap: troll insults
<spoiler>
<blockquote><p><i> Maybe you were thinking of cpandeps from CPAN:FindDependencies by DrHyde? </i><p> Obviously not you dumb troll Khen1950fx, that module doesn't come with a cli and does a totally different job
</blockquote>
</spoiler>
<p> [id://1036662]
Reason: [LanX]: reap: troll + personal attacks
<spoiler>
<blockquote>
<p><i> Maybe you were thinking of cpandeps from CPAN:FindDependencies by DrHyde? </i><p> Obviously not Khen1950fx, scandeps versus scandeps.pl is three characters difference, and that module doesn't come with a cli and does a totally different job -- typical Khen1950fx nonsense</blockquote>
</spoiler>
<p> [id://1037079]
Reason: [LanX]: reap: troll! Again personal attacks
<spoiler>
<blockquote>
<p><i> Maybe you were thinking of cpandeps from CPAN:FindDependencies by DrHyde? </i>
<p> Of course I wasn't
<p> The difference between scandeps and scandeps.pl is three characters
<p> Also CPAN:FindDependencies is used to read META.yml not generate META.yml, it doesn't do the same job as scandeps
<p> As usual , Khen1950fx you didn't read or understand what was written, you simply scanned for a few keywords, then searched for those keywords, and pasted something from the search results
</blockquote>
</spoiler>
</readmore>
<p> And consider what the [PerlMonks FAQ] say on the matter
<readmore>
<p> [id://326922|How do I use the power of consideration responsibly?]
<blockquote>Consideration is NOT an appropriate vehicle for expressing your personal agreement or disagreement with the node's contents, nor for expressing your distaste for its manner of expression.</blockquote>
<p> [id://92975|What is consideration? Guidelines for Troll Posts ]
<blockquote>
Only blatant, egregiously offensive troll posts should be considered for reapage. For useless, stupid, off-topic, and annoying nodes: if it is a root node, then don't approve it for any section. if it is a reply, just ignore it. (Downvote it if you wish.)
</blockquote>
</readmore>
<p> A definition of personal attack <readmore>
<p> [href://http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Personal_attack|Personal attack - Definition | WordIQ.com]
<blockquote>
Generally, a personal attack is committed when a person substitutes
abusive remarks for evidence when examining another person's claims or
comments. It is considered a personal attack when a person starts
referencing a supposed flaw or weakness in an individual's personality,
beliefs, lifestyle, convictions or principles, and use it as a debate
tactic or as a means of avoiding discussion of the relevance or
truthfulness of what the person said. It works on the reasoning that, by
discrediting the source of an argument, e.g. the person making it, the
argument itself can be weakened.
</blockquote>
</readmore>
<p> <b> So what is perlmonks definition of "personal attack" and "trolling"? Can a user lose his power to consider nodes? </b>
10