note
blazar
<blockquote><i>::MY might be what I tried to describe with %PAD stash, a dynamic symboltable for the current scope, making [cpan://padwalker] obsolete.</i></blockquote>
<p><em>I personally believe</em> that, as a side note, you may want to hyperlink to [mod://PadWalker] by means of <c>[mod://PadWalker]</c>, stressing incidentally that capitalization <em>does</em> matter.</p>
<blockquote><i>And I think I can imagine what is meant lexical scoped packages, in perl 5 packages have no privacy at all, you can access them from everywhere. But if the packagename is scoped you may control it.</i></blockquote>
<p>What a lexically scoped package is, after all, is clear and intuitive. But one point that perhaps I didn't stress enough is the following: <strong>if</strong> things are still like I claimed them to be, that is that lexical variables are implemented by means of a single magic package, then the latter must have a "slots" for... well, packages too, which sounded somewhat self-referential <em>when I wrote my previous post.</em> On a second thought, though, not just as much... More precisely, I don't see any issue with this circumstance any more. I don't know what I was thinking: anyway, before spending even the slightest [wp://Brainstorming|braindrop] on the subject, I'd like someone who knows better to pinpoint the key elements of it, which we just surfaced here.</p>
<div class="pmsig"><div class="pmsig-409850">
<small><c>-- </c><br/>
If you can't understand the [wp://incipit], then please check the <strong>[http://blazar.tumblr.com/post/17639246|IPB Campaign]</strong>.</small>
</div></div>
724856
725138