1

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
{$i++; redo} by MeowChow (Vicar) on Apr 29, 2001 at 05:09 UTC
All your integers are belong to me. MeowChow s aamecha.s a..a\u$&owag.print	[reply]
Re: {$i++; redo} by dws (Chancellor) on Apr 29, 2001 at 07:17 UTC
You can have the integers. I'll take the imaginary numbers. They're a lot more fun.	[reply]
Re (tilly) 2: {$i++; redo} by tilly (Archbishop) on Apr 29, 2001 at 07:24 UTC
Keep the integers and imaginary numbers. I will take all of the mixtures. I guess that makes me a complex kind of guy.	[reply]
Re: Re (tilly) 2: {$i++; redo} by premchai21 (Curate) on Jun 14, 2001 at 20:08 UTC
(elbie): {$i++;redo} by elbie (Curate) on Sep 05, 2001 at 18:21 UTC
All your integers base 16 are belong to us. elbieelbieelbie	[reply]
Re: (elbie): {$i++;redo} by NateTut (Deacon) on Mar 15, 2005 at 14:48 UTC
Real Men Like Real Numbers	[reply]
2 by WebHick (Scribe) on Apr 28, 2001 at 06:15 UTC
This node was originally intended to plug a bug in the monestary. Our Fearless Leader fixed the bug so this node is now very, very useless. Sarah	[reply]
Re: 2 by philosophia (Sexton) on May 06, 2004 at 23:02 UTC
yes it is very useless	[reply]
How not to create links to this node by doom (Deacon) on Jun 02, 2007 at 22:30 UTC
If you think you can write a footnote like `[1]`, you've probably just created a link to this node. You're probably better off embedding it in `<C>` tags: if you enter `<C>[1]</C>` it will look like `[1]`. And if you look down below the submission box at the helpful hints you've long since stopped reading, they recommend using numbered html entities like `[1&#93`, but that seems like too much work to me.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
9 by jdporter (Paladin) on Sep 02, 2005 at 04:08 UTC
that is, if 6 was 9. Answer: 42.	[reply]
Re: 9 by Anonymous Monk on Mar 13, 2007 at 08:14 UTC
nice	[reply]
3 by epoptai (Curate) on Apr 28, 2001 at 06:21 UTC
This could get interesting..., to a 2 year old :-/ UHH: It used to be possible to see secret (but not too interesting) nodes like 1-9 by entering that number in the search form 8^}	[reply]
5 by gryng (Hermit) on Apr 28, 2001 at 07:22 UTC
ga, goo ga, ga.	[reply]
Re: 5 by providencia (Pilgrim) on Apr 28, 2001 at 09:01 UTC
Coochie-coochie coo! "Lights, Camel, Action!" --Stump A Fierce Pancake(1988) Charleton Heston(track 8)	[reply]
4 by ysth (Canon) on May 07, 2004 at 00:20 UTC
equal rights for squares!	[reply]
353414 by ysth (Canon) on May 14, 2004 at 16:34 UTC
A self-referential $link[0]. (`A self-referential $link[0].`) Update: doesn't work; at least I have the satisfaction of having an untitled node with a title. Update: now seems to work when shown directly, but not when showing 1.	[reply] [d/l]
7 by Chady (Priest) on Apr 28, 2001 at 10:11 UTC
duh!!!! He who asks will be a fool for five minutes, but he who doesn't ask will remain a fool for life. Chady \| http://chady.net/	[reply]
Re: 1 by james28909 (Deacon) on Jun 02, 2016 at 01:52 UTC
this is test for the first post? woooo!!!!	[reply]


Think about Loose Coupling
	PerlMonks