Slip, slide, slip, slide. Down the content control slope we go.
As some folks are aware, i am against the
editors group in its current incarnation, the current
consideration system, and i am against this as well.
- This appears to have the same lack of accountability as the editors group
- Where does humor or satire become abuse? How is it decided? Another committee? Oh joy.
- "select set of users" how are they selected? fiat? open vote?
- I see no evidence that there is even a problem to begin with; what has antivroom done wrong?
I am not prepared to support a system remotely like this; you will be punishing people for having a "position" (if you can call a nick a position) that people simply don't like. That is censorship, and i do not approve.
