Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister

Re^12: $1 not "freezing" in an addition

by Anonymous Monk
on Dec 16, 2012 at 02:42 UTC ( #1009039=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^11: $1 not "freezing" in an addition
in thread $1 not "freezing" in an addition

Apply some magic and better ignore the troll! =)

Anonymous Monk expresses a few simple ideas and chromatic has to start conflating them on purpose

 $1 ... foo() there is no ambigiuity, the potential exists for this bug

so what is the problem with a user asking for extra warnings, extra debugging mode, extra potential criticism, even if they don't cover 100% of all situations, even if they can be wrong, even if it requires a special compile of perl for descend into xs, or running scandeps, or whatever?

oh right, must be a troll

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^13: $1 not "freezing" in an addition
by LanX (Bishop) on Dec 16, 2012 at 03:23 UTC
    P::C depends on PPI.

    PPI does per definition static parsing.

    What you're asking is far beyond the scope of P::C!

    But if you think it's feasible, you're more than welcome do demonstrate we are wrong by releasing such a new magic tool.

    So ... either you lack the know how to understand the limitations of parsing a dynamic language or you are trolling us.

    In both cases no need to waist more time with someone who hides behind anonymity.

    Cheers Rolf


Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1009039]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (12)
As of 2018-07-16 14:22 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer?

    Results (341 votes). Check out past polls.