Re^5: Operator precedence

to make things clear? I would NEVER use that construct.

I wasn't advocating it, I was just amused by it :)

That said, I think the terms confuse things because they mean nothing, How about:

open( FH, '<', $ARGV[ 2 ] ) or die( "$! : $ARGV[ 2 ]" ) if $ARGV[ 2 ];
[download]

Or:

eval $code or die $@ if $code;
[download]

Doesn't seem so uncommon once you substitute realistic terms.

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Comment on Re^5: Operator precedence Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Operator precedence by Tux (Canon) on Jan 20, 2013 at 15:35 UTC
All evenly confusing, as my mind hates statement modifiers. I try to prevent using them as long as possible. To me `statement if expression;` reads as utter crap. I prefer reading `expression and statement;`. YMMV. I completely realize not all our minds work the same, so any other reader might be confused the other way round. Mixing these will hurt both. The only statement modifier I am comfortable with is `for` in simple expressions like `s{\s+$}{} for @foo;`. Enjoy, Have FUN! H.Merijn	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^7: Operator precedence by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 20, 2013 at 17:01 UTC
To me statement if expression; reads as utter crap. Hm. I find 'Pick up a bottle of duty free Scotch if you have time' and 'If you have time, pick up a bottle of duty free Scotch' completely interchangeable. And 'beat the egg whites until they form soft peaks', infinitely preferable to 'until they form soft peaks; beat the egg whites'; With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. ol	[reply]
Re^8: Operator precedence by Tux (Canon) on Jan 20, 2013 at 18:49 UTC
With the Scotch example, I definitely prefer the second sentence. With the first, my hopes on a good single malt are trashed when hitting "if" :) `until` in there is a loop condition, not a single point of decision condition. Maybe that is what is important to my brain. The condition is most likely checked several times. My native language however is not English, so that might be of influence. Enjoy, Have FUN! H.Merijn	[reply] [d/l]


P is for Practical
	PerlMonks