Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight

Re^3: LWP Authorisation issue (not really)

by Anonymous Monk
on Feb 25, 2013 at 12:39 UTC ( #1020510=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: LWP Authorisation issue (not really)
in thread LWP Authorisation issue

Plus,Do u seek any issue in my code?

I see some issues, but I don't know if fixing them will help you

I see you didn't use strict/warnings to cut your development time in half!

I see you don't dump in handler but do something else

I see you check the value of show_progres instead of turning it on

You use the bareword TIMEOUT for timeout

I see add your own Basic header and use/credentials -- I don't know what that will do, but that is kind of the purpose behind LWP, to do that for you

Also, WWW::Mechanize can simplify your LWP::UserAgent interaction, no need for constant status_line checks as it will die for you,
or saving the response, it keeps track of all that ( WWW::Mechanize::Cookbook, mech-dump )

WWW::Scripter is a Mechanize helper

  • Comment on Re^3: LWP Authorisation issue (not really)

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1020510]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (3)
As of 2018-07-19 00:33 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer?

    Results (398 votes). Check out past polls.