|go ahead... be a heretic|
Re^14: How many man-hours would you estimate you have invested in learning Perl?by BrowserUk (Pope)
|on Apr 17, 2013 at 19:52 UTC||Need Help??|
To assume that targeting all feminists is sexist is to make a sexist assumption about the composition of feminists.
It would be sexist, because it would target the philosophy of feminism. While not all feminists are female; the philosophy deals exclusively with rights of; and prejudices enacted against; women.
Thus attacking 'all feminists' is to attack that philosophy; and thus is an attack on women (feminist or not); and is thus sexist.
(I believe that is essentially a from memory paraphrase of a US Supreme court ruling; but I cannot find it. It is also possible I got it from a movie or a book.)
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.