Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: using the power of consideration responsibly (what is personal attack what is trolling, can you lose power to consider)

by Anonymous Monk
on Jun 08, 2013 at 01:58 UTC ( #1037787=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: using the power of consideration responsibly (what is personal attack what is trolling, can you lose power to consider)
in thread using the power of consideration responsibly (what is personal attack what is trolling, can you lose power to consider)

And who will check whether the decision to revoke the consideration rights of some Monks is taken rightly?

Who watches the watchmen? They watch themselves :) or the gods watch them.

I imagine janitors or power users, the folks actually making these types of decisions, would have final say, and if someone wants to appeal a decision, they might "/msg janitors" or gods or start a thread in Perl Monks Discussion... as gods would set this up, whatever protocol they decide is what would be used, just like everything on perlmonks

  • Comment on Re^2: using the power of consideration responsibly (what is personal attack what is trolling, can you lose power to consider)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: using the power of consideration responsibly (what is personal attack what is trolling, can you lose power to consider)
by CountZero (Bishop) on Jun 08, 2013 at 07:30 UTC
    Even the gods are human (and not only here on Perlmonks), so their decisions are likely to be as good (or bad) as the considerations of ordinary monks.

    CountZero

    A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James

    My blog: Imperial Deltronics

      Even the gods are human (and not only here on Perlmonks), so their decisions are likely to be as good (or bad) as the considerations of ordinary monks.

      Sure, but I don't see that as a problem. I've been around perlmonks a long time, and the gods are pretty level headed even tempered bunch

        the gods are pretty level headed even tempered bunch
        But so are most of the active Perlmonks and as one Monk's consideration alone cannot do much, you get automatically an "average" opinion on these issues, which --I assume-- will be very much in line with what the gods think.

        CountZero

        A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James

        My blog: Imperial Deltronics

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1037787]
help
Chatterbox?
[Tanktalus]: it's all the same process, and, IIRC, the same mechanized object.
[Tanktalus]: hmm, no, the mech object for posting isn't the same as reading, but it's the same as the logging in one.
[Tanktalus]: I really need to rewrite this whole thing anyway. :)

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (6)
As of 2018-07-15 21:36 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer?















    Results (326 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?