|Problems? Is your data what you think it is?|
Re^5: v5, a reimplementation of P5 (was Re^5: A "Perl-7" that I could actually USE right now)by BrowserUk (Pope)
|on Jul 03, 2013 at 05:40 UTC||Need Help??|
The P6 design specifies ...
Again, you deliberately skirt the actual issue and attempt to filibuster your way past it by quoting fanciful "definitions" from the unrealised -- and in many cases; unrealisable(*) -- hotch-potch of vague hopes and wishes that is called the 'P6 spec'.
The issue is: Does any existing, downloadable version of P6 actually implement any form of laziness?
And the answer is obviously no, otherwise you would not be applying spin. And that makes the Rosetta P6 code claims vapourware at best, or much worse.
And it is false advertising and marketing of that very ilk that has in the past -- and continues at an accelerating rate -- to damage brands far more deeply and permanently than actual lack of functionality or technical failures.
Please heed the warning. The lie of omission is still a lie.
(*You do not want me to get into elaborating this in open forum)
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.