Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer
Re: Laziness? (was Re^6: v5, a reimplementation of P5 (was Re^5: A "Perl-7" that I could actually USE right now))by BrowserUk (Pope)
|on Jul 03, 2013 at 15:38 UTC||Need Help??|
Rakudo's gather/take implementation is lazy. (And so is Niecza's.)
Really? Why not respond with that in the first place instead of all the fluff you posted?
And what is the basis of that laziness? (Hint: threading? corroutines? continuations? a little man hidden under the table?)
There is no spin. I can't stop you seeing it if you believe it's there. But it is not there.
Right. Were all just seeing things.
But it would suck if you have permanently joined the ranks of the rabidly anti P6. :P
I'm not anti-p6 (rabid or otherwise), just anti-BS.
If it were possible to have a straight conversation about Perl6 -- rather than a "straight conversation (for some definition of the word straight)" -- then I might have gotten on-board; but that hasn't been possible since pugs was frozen out to death.
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.