Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister

Re^8: Anti-Spam: Quarantine section? (fix)

by LanX (Bishop)
on Jul 09, 2013 at 11:59 UTC ( #1043304=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^7: Anti-Spam: Quarantine section? (fix)
in thread Anti-Spam: Quarantine section?

I wasn't talking about voting or reputation, but about the benefit of "approving" new nodes.

Whatever, I think a "Quarantine" section to move the junk away from the list views till they are reaped is a useful idea. Though I don't think it will ever be implemented. :)

Cheers Rolf

( addicted to the Perl Programming Language)

  • Comment on Re^8: Anti-Spam: Quarantine section? (fix)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^9: Anti-Spam: Quarantine section? (not a fix)
by tye (Sage) on Jul 09, 2013 at 13:35 UTC

    As I said, "But that would just push the spammers to a different posting strategy".

    I don't like spelling out instructions for spammers, but I'm pretty sure that they would figure it out, even though you haven't: (instructions removed).

    - tye        

      agreed, I can't see any available mechanism in the monastery (well except faster consideration) to counter this.

      > I don't like spelling out instructions for spammers

      I don't mind if you delete the following words again. :)

      Cheers Rolf

      ( addicted to the Perl Programming Language)

Re^9: Anti-Spam: Quarantine section? (fix)
by choroba (Bishop) on Jul 09, 2013 at 12:08 UTC
    Oh, I missed the context :-(
    لսႽ ᥲᥒ⚪⟊Ⴙᘓᖇ Ꮅᘓᖇ⎱ Ⴙᥲ𝇋ƙᘓᖇ

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1043304]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (4)
As of 2018-06-20 04:13 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?

    Results (116 votes). Check out past polls.