|
|
|
| Problems? Is your data what you think it is? | |
| PerlMonks |
Re^3: Simple regex question. Grouping with a negative lookahead assertion.by BrowserUk (Patriarch) |
| on Jul 14, 2013 at 06:36 UTC ( [id://1044202]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
I was also trying to prevent any characters that were not in the following character class, [acgt], from being included in the match. Is that a possibility? If so, then substitute that for . in my regex. (S'not rocket science.) But, if it is a possibility, then you could (should) have included a non-acgt character in your example. And if the example you provided is realistic, then using [acgt] is redundant, because your example consists entirely of those characters. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||