Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Your skill will accomplish
what the force of many cannot
 
PerlMonks  

Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 10: Kickstarter & Performance Benchmarks

by Will_the_Chill (Pilgrim)
on Nov 27, 2013 at 00:41 UTC ( #1064505=perlnews: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

Howdy Monks,

We've added initial performance benchmarks, which are very promising indeed!

http://rperl.org/performance_benchmarks.html

Also, our Kickstarter campaign is now live, please consider backing the RPerl v1.0 project, our pledge drive ends on Wednesday December 4th, so don't delay!

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/wbraswell/perl-5-optimizing-compiler-rperl-v10

Thank you all so much for your support to make Perl better and faster for everyone!

Perling,
~ Will the Chill
  • Comment on Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 10: Kickstarter & Performance Benchmarks

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 10: Kickstarter & Performance Benchmarks
by vkon (Curate) on Nov 28, 2013 at 17:49 UTC
    in this thing, the "perl 11" is a very nice invention
    this seemingly solves the problem when perl6 name stays on the way, and current p5p pumpking holders refuse to recognize this problem, thus provibiting a discussion of "perl7" or smth like that.

    Within this "perl11.org", there is perl11 and there is p2.

    Can you shed a light on how these will compare to each other?
    Which one is faster? what about compatibility with each other?

    TIA

      Hi vkon,

      Great questions! You are correct, there is an issue with Perl 6 blocking progress and P5P Pumpkings also blocking progress. Saint Larry says we can have no Perl 7 until Perl 6 is finished, which may be never!

      Perl 11 is a philosophy, specifically the idea that we can re-unify Perl 5 and Perl 6 if we are able to make Perl pluggable at the 3 main levels of grammar/parser, compiler/bytecode, and VM/interpreter/runtime. Perl 11 is not an actual software product itself, and Perl 11 is not an actual version of Perl. (Yet.) There are multiple projects that fall under the Perl 11 umbrella, many of which are listed on the Perl 11 website. I'm currently working on a more exhaustive comparison table for ALL Perl projects, and I'm already up to 37 of them!

      P2 is Reini Urban's software project to build a new JIT runtime for both Perl 5 and Perl 6 using the pre-existing Potion VM. The "2" in "P2" comes from adding together the two "1" digits in "Perl 11". :-)

      RPerl is my software project to build a Perl-to-C optimizing compiler for low-magic Perl 5 code. RPerl is very different than P2, in that RPerl is focused on high-speed and low-magic Perl 5 only. Also, RPerl uses the existing Perl 5 code, and P2 is totally new and different than the existing Perl 5.

      There are also several other Perl 11 projects, you may wish to read more about them at the Perl 11 website.

      Did I answer your questions? Will you please consider making a generous pledge to support RPerl development?

      Thanks!

      Perling,
      ~ Will
        I'm currently working on a more exhaustive comparison table for ALL Perl projects, and I'm already up to 37 of them!

        If you don't already have it, don't leave out Topaz, which, while long dead, was helpful to chip in working on Parrot.

        --
        A math joke: r = | |csc(θ)|+|sec(θ)| |-| |csc(θ)|-|sec(θ)| |
        yes, that answers my questions, thanks,
        nice answer, indeed
        ... yet I have another Q, if I may

        This "frequently asked questions" section - what, people continuously asked you in mailing list or whatever else with namely these questions, so you've grouped them and placed in a public place?
        How often these Qs are indeed asked??

      Why, since you think its pointless and bound to fail? Trying to waste someones time?
        bound to fail - yes.... pointless - mostly yes, but not entirely pointless...
        glad you've asked.
Re: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 10: Kickstarter & Performance Benchmarks
by Laurent_R (Canon) on Nov 28, 2013 at 23:44 UTC
    Sure enough, the benchmark results you are reporting look great. But you are not saying at all how they were obtained. And it seems from you own admission that some of the program versions were "hand-compiled", whatever this means. Sorry, too sketchy to be convincing. Your idea might be great, and I would like to believe in it, but so far, I wish you have convinced me.
      Hi Laurent_R,

      Sorry if I'm not being clear. In the second paragraph of the Performance Benchmarks page you will see I have linked to the actual source code files that were run to generate the timings.

      The first step toward reproducing the benchmarks yourself is to get RPerl installed and passing the basic tests, please see the use RPerl; page for more info. RPerl is still alpha software being developed, so don't hesitate to let me know if you need help or have any questions. I'm often in #perl11 on irc.perl.org if you use IRC.

      We already have the basic scalar, array, and hash data types working in RPerl. The "hand-compiled" part of the performance benchmark refers to the fact that RPerl v1.0 is not complete yet and thus there is not yet an actual automatic compiling mechanism in place. Using the working RPerl data types I played the part of a compiler and manually compiled the sorting algorithm code from pure Perl 5 into both RPerl Perl-data mode and RPerl C-data mode, as explained in the Performance Benchmark page.

      Did I answer your questions? My goal is to win your support and convince you to make a pledge to the RPerl Kickstarter campaign.

      Thanks!

      Perling,
      ~ Will
        reini stated that his typed data in perl will be a huge speed win (preseented at Riga YAPC2011)

        will his approach outperform yours and by what %-tage? where to invest?

Re: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 10: Kickstarter & Performance Benchmarks
by frew (Acolyte) on Nov 30, 2013 at 21:08 UTC
    Care to comment on this, from the kickstarter? "RPerl is 100% free-of-charge for all non-commercial use."

    Does anyone really want to have to pay to use perl? There's no way I'd donate to something that's not going to be Free.
    fREW Schmidt
    http://blog.afoolishmanifesto.com
      frew,

      Thanks for your question, it's been asked before and is now clarified in the FAQ:

      Q: How much does RPerl cost?

      A: RPerl is 100% free-of-charge for all non-commercial use as licensed under the same terms as Perl 5.18.0. This means you can use RPerl at home or at work, but you can't re-sell RPerl without the source code and you can't change the copyright terms.

      Does that answer your question?

      Thanks!

      Perling,
      ~ Will

        Thatís cool, because Perl is happily being used commercially too. So if itís ďunder the same terms as Perl 5.18.0Ē, I do quite believe you shouldnít be emphasising that itís free for non-commercial use. Or itís not under the exact same terms.

        Decide.

Re: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 10: Kickstarter & Performance Benchmarks
by vkon (Curate) on Dec 28, 2013 at 19:54 UTC
    any news on the matter?

    Your FAQ reads that the release is at Christmas...

        vkon & Corion,

        I'm sure you know by now that we've released RPerl v1.0 beta on New Year's Day, better late than never for a nice little Christmas present, haha! :-)

        We're working now to get rid of the "beta" and have another release very soon. Thanks for your continued interest in RPerl!

        Perling,
        ~ Will the Chill
    A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
    A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: perlnews [id://1064505]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (4)
As of 2018-09-19 03:16 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Eventually, "covfefe" will come to mean:













    Results (163 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?
    • (Sep 10, 2018 at 22:53 UTC) Welcome new users!