![]() |
|
Think about Loose Coupling | |
PerlMonks |
Re^3: Constant redefinedby Anonymous Monk |
on Dec 06, 2013 at 17:17 UTC ( [id://1066018]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
But isn't this conceptually incorrect? why would someone want to modify a constant? if it was to be modified then why is it declared as a constant in the first place?
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|