Re^5: Data visualisation. (updated)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Data visualisation. (unreasonable) by Anonymous Monk on Jan 03, 2014 at 09:49 UTC
The best translation of the "Arsch" or "Arschloch" in this context is "bastard". That is still vulgar (aka profane); so I don't see how that is important or relevant at all; This is the exchange summary Q: BuK: any help please A: LanX: I know school maths, hope this helps! R: BuK: not really R: stupid asshole / motherfucker / prick / fucker / bleeder / bugger / shitass / bastard So whatever the actual german language insult really means it don't matter -- LanX is being unreasonable and rude for the sake of being unreasonably rude ;; He has considered nodes for reaping for less offensive language than he has used here	[reply]
Re^7: Data visualisation. (unreasonable) by choroba (Cardinal) on Jan 03, 2014 at 10:16 UTC
LanX just used the words BrowserUK had used for him before (but translated). It does not make either of them cool. Update: The reference: Re^3: How would you parse this?. لսႽ† ᥲᥒ⚪⟊Ⴙᘓᖇ Ꮅᘓᖇ⎱ Ⴙᥲ𝇋ƙᘓᖇ	[reply]
Re^8: Data visualisation. (unreasonable) by Anonymous Monk on Jan 03, 2014 at 12:22 UTC
LanX just used the words BrowserUK had used for him before (but translated). It does not make either of them cool. That isn't very reasonable choroba, the context matters Swearing at trolling (what BuK did) is not the same as swearing at an honest response (what LanX did) LanX bit BuK head off -- violating the very etiquette he chided BuK as not following If you go around "moderating" and chiding folks, you should follow your own advice, keep your nose clean	[reply]
Re^7: Data visualisation. (unreasonable) by Anonymous Monk on Jan 03, 2014 at 10:05 UTC
He has considered nodes for reaping for less offensive language than he has used here Indeed, but that was trolling from Anonymous Monks. LanX's real name is known. OTOH BUKs real name is kept secret. Which doesn't stop him being rude or attacking other monks revealing their real name: Who gave (and continues to give) Tye his authority for his autocratic domination of PerlMonks? So what's your definition of trolling or misconduct?	[reply]
Re^8: Data visualisation. (unreasonable) by Anonymous Monk on Jan 03, 2014 at 12:27 UTC
... none of which is relevant to being reasonable and staying on topic ;; the purpose behind having perlmonks is to have a civilized discussion ;; you cannot turn every thread into a flamefest because some time in the past OP said something rude to you So what's your definition of trolling or misconduct? This is the idea of perlmonks: OP asks for help, responders try to help, in calm rational discussion Any response which isn't trying to help the op, which is making jokes ... is trolling Its ok if you can't help the op; Its OK if OP says "that doesn't help me" ; Calling the OP stupid-bastard for saying "no help" is unacceptable	[reply]


good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW
	PerlMonks