Re: How can I write this in a "simpler" way?


Syntactic Confectionery Delight
	PerlMonks

by Anonymous Monk

on Feb 11, 2014 at 23:22 UTC ( #1074535=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

I just found this:

while(defined $line=<STDIN>)
{
 so something
}
[download]

Is this the way to go?

Comment on Re: How can I write this in a "simpler" way? Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: How can I write this in a "simpler" way? by choroba (Cardinal) on Feb 11, 2014 at 23:37 UTC
It still uses the `<>` operator, with STDIN as the operand. لսႽ† ᥲᥒ⚪⟊Ⴙᘓᖇ Ꮅᘓᖇ⎱ Ⴙᥲ𝇋ƙᘓᖇ	[reply] [d/l]
Re^3: How can I write this in a "simpler" way? by Anonymous Monk on Feb 12, 2014 at 00:07 UTC
Yeah, his "problem" is not to use the <> like the general way, <STDIN> is acceptable.	[reply]

Domain Nodelet^?

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://1074535]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others contemplating the Monastery: (4)

As of 2023-01-28 10:27 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

No recent polls found

Notices^?