If this is the case should these docs be updated to remove:
"The code generated in this way is not guaranteed to work. The whole codegen suite (perlcc included) should be considered very experimental. Use for production purposes is strongly discouraged."
perlcc.PL
| [reply] |
That's a standard disclaimer. I would most definitely try it.
| [reply] |
Where else do you see this "standard disclaimer"? The last time I quoted this rurban said:
"Your citations are wrong."
Given that he has the ownership of something which he claims is not accurate, shouldn't the documentation be updated to reflect this?
| [reply] |
A grep of the perl and linux source code trees shows one hit of this "standard disclaimer", in perlcc.PL. Your definition is wrong, one use is not a "standard". Definition of "standard": "something used as a measure, norm, or model in comparative evaluations" or "used or accepted as normal or average."
| [reply] |
