|We don't bite newbies here... much|
Re^3: The future of Perl?by wjw (Priest)
|on Nov 09, 2014 at 17:05 UTC||Need Help??|
Thanks for that BrowserUK. Those points are informative to me, and seem to be on the money.
Clearly the example I used is a poor one for having tried to make the point I was attempting to make. (My lack of depth of knowledge in the arena). Perhaps our understanding of language is driving our innovation in hardware instead of the reverse. I wonder what might happen if the reverse was approached more aggressively. Maybe that is what is happening at a certain level in the fields of bio-mimicry and maybe even in quantum computing.
At any rate, I think you are right; hardware does not affect languages at this point in time, but I don't doubt that it will in the future. I find it hard to believe that all machine languages by nature have to operate at the basic level in one of two states. I think the success thus far has limited the innovation.
I have gone way off track relative to the original post and suspect I better stop. Thanks for the interesting meditation.
...the majority is always wrong, and always the last to know about it...
Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results...
A solution is nothing more than a clearly stated problem...otherwise, the problem is not a problem, it is simply an inconvenient fact