Dear Nobody,
Without an inviting predicate, a citation of what “negative” is to mean here, some kind of context, or an identity attached I think it is the kind of driveby newthink, semantic whitewashing, manipulative, safespace, pablumizing horseplay—not synonyms for garbage but I’m trying to meet you half-way—that I am embarrassed to be around or associated with. I can’t tell this kind of thing from trolling without context. On that note, I am nicer to named monks. When this was considered, I voted to receive, obtain, get, acquire, secure, bring in, realize, derive, procure.
Sincerely,
Mrs Dr Thy Mother, née :P Grumpybritches-Toddlewitch
| [reply] |
Why didn't you put that info in the OP? We can't read your mind.
Of course, if you were logged in, you could go and edit the post to make it better.
| [reply] |
... a nice happy pragma ...
Like useModern::Perl; maybe??? (We're already using perl :)
Update: dict.org sez Moby Thesaurus sez use is synonymous with "abuse", "bad habit", "bleed", "bleed white", "exploit", "impose", "impose upon", "ravages of time", "ritual", "stereotype", "use ill", so maybe we need to adopt a synonym for use; "include" is nice and positive. :)
Give a man a fish: <%-{-{-{-<
| [reply]
[d/l]
[select] |
| [reply]
[d/l]
[select] |
If this is one of the things that worry you then maybe you oughtn't be out in the wild and (pretending to be) programming. You ought to sit quietly painting colorful paintings (using eco-bio-fairtrade-organic pigments only) in a well padded safe zone.
By the way programs in Visual Basic tend(ed) to start with
Option Strict
Option Explicit
Sounds kinda BDSMish.
Jenda
1984 was supposed to be a warning,
not a manual!
| [reply]
[d/l] |
