Re^2: The future of mod_perl

[Gavin]

A reasonable question, I don't think it deserves all the down votes

[Fletch]

Seeing as it's based on the same (wrong) assumption ("mod_perl is only for speeding up content generation") that the other anon-o post above does (which I'd replied to hours before this one was created) I don't think it really adds anything (not to mention troll poster is troll).

(Looks like I've been playing with clojure too much recently (and it's rubbing off on my commenting style (again)))

[hippo]

If it were an innocently naive poster I would absolutely agree with you and respond to it, pointing out and correcting their errors, misconceptions, etc. However, as it is just Mike's usual trollery I shall simply refrain, downvote and move on.

[Gavin]

Fair point, but that's one of the problems with anon posting.

[Your Mother]

It’s a series of ignorant humble-bragging assertions pretending to be a question with “pointless” typographical flourishes. It’s clearly him. It deserves fewer upvotes.