Re^3: Perl "CAT" response to Pumpking resignation turmoil

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Perl "CAT" response to Pumpking resignation turmoil by syphilis (Archbishop) on Apr 28, 2021 at 13:14 UTC
Hi Rob, Does it mean you didn't stay in the p5p maillist any more? Hi xiaoyafeng, I'm still subscribed there, and I noticed immediately the announcement that Sawyer had quit. But I didn't pick up on the existence (or the activities) of the CAT until I followed the link that 1nickt's original post to this thread provided. That's the bit that was "news to me". Interestingly, 1nickt's original post seems to have magically reappeared with its "Off Topic" banner removed, and we are no longer discouraged from replying to it. Also there's no acknowledgement (that I can see) of the OT banner having ever been there. I'm tempted to think that we are all therefore free to edit our posts without acknowledging that we've done so ... but that's probably a right that's given only to the privileged. Cheers, Rob	[reply]
Re^5: Perl "CAT" response to Pumpking resignation turmoil by Discipulus (Canon) on Apr 28, 2021 at 17:03 UTC
Hello syphilis Tsk.. tsk.. did you read my post? :) I quoted the banner and then, having the right being a janitor, I moved back to news, so I have update my answer with: PS April 27 16:53 GMT-1 I have moved the post back to Perl News L* There are no rules, there are no thumbs.. Reinvent the wheel, then learn The Wheel; may be one day you reinvent one of THE WHEELS.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^6: Perl "CAT" response to Pumpking resignation turmoil by syphilis (Archbishop) on Apr 29, 2021 at 00:09 UTC
Tsk.. tsk.. did you read my post? :) Yes, but probably before you updated it. I (mis)understood that post to be a request that either the banner be explained or the banner be removed. I can now see that it was not a request but an ultimatum - that is, either explain it or "I shall remove it". Cheers, Rob	[reply]


laziness, impatience, and hubris
	PerlMonks