yes, you are right.
Can there be some magic behind that -e 'con' which obviously did not kick in in the Unix case? I tried to use logic in the absence of a windows machine, but that failed me, being m$! "CON" (like LPT, AUX and some others) are all DOS reserved words and can not be the name of files, unless doing some hack (which will confuse Perl!). So, I am not sure that your dir CON failed because of that restriction or because of not existing a CON file. In any event, your perl oneliner is proof enough.
| [reply] [d/l] [select] |
Sorry, yes, my point with the dir CON was to show there wasn't a filesystem file in the active directory called CON, that the -e "con" really was finding the magic CON, not some local file or directory that happened to be named CON. I guess I should have added more verbiage to explain that.
| [reply] [d/l] [select] |