![]() |
|
There's more than one way to do things | |
PerlMonks |
Re^3: Thoughts on new 'class' OO in upcoming perlby LanX (Saint) |
on Mar 07, 2023 at 23:57 UTC ( [id://11150839]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
> (like having both a package and a class with the same name). Please excuse my ignorance, if it's not for speed, why else? What is the incentive for those parallel structures instead of building on top resp. wrapping around existing ones? Like a class is a special package, a new is blessing a hash, etc ...?
Cheers Rolf
In Section
Meditations
|
|