Re^5: SO and AI

[dsheroh]

The quote is still relevant, as it shows that stevieb has a *cough* non-standard *cough* concept of what constitutes "attribution". With a little more context, his quote was:

I have not been notified nor paid for my small contributions. Therefore I have not been attributed to.

If he said that he wants attribution and if not being paid means (to him) that he has not been attributed to, then he did say that he wants to be paid.

[choroba]

> he did say that he wants to be paid.

Or notified. That's what he said.

[LanX]

I agree about the "cough", and he hasn't replied yet to my questions.

And he's dragging his beef with SO to us, without further explanation what exactly happened.

Anyway SO has a CC licence which gives him the right to "attribution", and I am not willing to re-"cough" the definition.

PM has no such licence, PM will/can't ever sell the data. But if PM decided to expand "super-search" by AI driven "super-ask" in the same non-commercial spirit, I don't see a way to block it.

Again, a lot of speculative "coughing" at the moment.