|
Re^3: poll ideas quest 2025
by choroba (Cardinal) on Jan 05, 2025 at 21:52 UTC
|
map{substr$_->[0],$_->[1]||0,1}[\*||{},3],[[]],[ref qr-1,-,-1],[{}],[sub{}^*ARGV,3]
| [reply]
[d/l] |
|
|
| [reply] |
|
|
> gobbledygook.pair.com
yes google is indexing them occasionally, often as qsXXX.pair.com with s/X/[0-9]/g
And the path is sometimes quite long and random because it's leading to some divine experiments, which were probably not meant for the public.
edit
For instance, try http://qs321.pair.com/~monkads/?node=soonix
| [reply]
[d/l]
[select] |
|
|
Re^3: poll ideas quest 2025
by Tux (Canon) on Jan 06, 2025 at 08:02 UTC
|
| [reply]
[d/l] |
Re^3: poll ideas quest 2025
by Arunbear (Prior) on Jan 06, 2025 at 17:38 UTC
|
Now there's the dilemma of authorship - talexb had the idea, but you did the hard work. We don't really have a good solution for this.
Also bear in mind all of this has to fit in the Voting Booth nodelet, so having fewer options is usually better.
| [reply] |
|
|
talexb had the idea, but you did the hard work
Give the authorship to talexb.
so having fewer options is usually better
I prefer the polls that give more choices, but if that provides technical challenges, or if there's a history showing that longer polls get fewer responses, then pollsters can pick whatever subset makes the most sense
| [reply] |
|
|
| [reply] |
|
|
Unfortunately, we don't have a mechanism for sharing authorship like that. In the past, I've often given up authorship of my own poll ideas by assigning them to pollsters. I could do that in this case if there are no objections. It's the nearest "solution" we have for indicating more than one author.
| [reply] |
|
|
|
|
|
