So there's really two questions here.
The first is why wasn't COW used for matching half of the code.
COW is normally used for the copy for $& and friends, but it wasn't used in this case because there's not enough space in the buffer.
CUR = 100
LEN = 101
I think two bytes are needed. One for the NUL, and one for the COW reference count. Replace $_ .= "x"; with chop;, and you get:
SV = PV(0x5deca7958ee0) at 0x5deca7994d68
REFCNT = 1
FLAGS = (POK,pPOK)
PV = 0x5deca7998850 "xxxxxxxxxx"...\0
CUR = 98
LEN = 101
SV = PV(0x5deca7958ee0) at 0x5deca7994d68
REFCNT = 1
FLAGS = (POK,IsCOW,pPOK)
PV = 0x5deca7998850 "xxxxxxxxxx"...\0
CUR = 98
LEN = 101
COW_REFCNT = 1
SV = PV(0x5deca7958ee0) at 0x5deca7994d68
REFCNT = 1
FLAGS = (POK,IsCOW,pPOK)
PV = 0x5deca797ad20 "aaa"\0
CUR = 3
LEN = 16
COW_REFCNT = 1
The second question is why does the scalar get a new buffer for the substitution.
I'm guessing the buffer of the scalar is stolen rather than copied for $& and friends, since the expectation is that it will change.
That means the scalar always gets a new buffer.
|