Re: The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...
by hippo (Bishop) on Jul 01, 2015 at 15:12 UTC
|
| [reply] |
Re: The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...
by marinersk (Priest) on Jul 01, 2015 at 15:13 UTC
|
Through evolution, the active queues in my work task list are actually P0, P1, and P3.
I keep separate lists for work, home, personal software develoment, novels, songs, game development, etc. They are prioritized on a mode basis -- when I'm at work, I use the work list; at home, the home list, etc.
| [reply] |
Re: The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...
by salva (Canon) on Jul 01, 2015 at 15:16 UTC
|
- Fun things
- Unimportant things
| [reply] |
Re: The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...
by chacham (Prior) on Jul 01, 2015 at 15:06 UTC
|
| [reply] |
Re: The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...
by barrd (Canon) on Jul 02, 2015 at 05:34 UTC
|
I would love at some point in the future to be able to state that 'fun', 'challenge related' and 'worth while causes' would be my priority order. However, in the real world (for the time being) my priority listing covers how I will pay for: Security, Warmth & Food. :) | [reply] |
Re: The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...
by afoken (Chancellor) on Jul 11, 2015 at 10:42 UTC
|
Unmögliches wird sofort erledigt. Wunder dauern etwas länger. Auf Wunsch kann auch gehext werden.
Rough translation:
Impossible gets done at once. Miracles take a little longer. Witchcraft used only on request.
Alexander
--
Today I will gladly share my knowledge and experience, for there are no sweeter words than "I told you so". ;-)
| [reply] |
Re: The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jul 02, 2015 at 05:39 UTC
|
| [reply] |
Re: The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...
by ksublondie (Friar) on Jul 06, 2015 at 17:47 UTC
|
1) Fire #1 which interrupted task #2
2) Fire #2 which interrupted task #3
3) What I *SHOULD* be working on | [reply] |
|
| [reply] |
|
my @originaltasks=($task1,$task2,$task3);
my @newtasks=@originaltasks;
while(@fires){
unshift @newtasks,$_;
pop @newtasks;
($task1,$task2,$task3)=@newtasks;
}
| [reply] [d/l] |
Re: The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...
by Pope-O-Matik (Pilgrim) on Jul 03, 2015 at 03:10 UTC
|
| [reply] |
Re: The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...
by vitoco (Friar) on Jul 03, 2015 at 16:08 UTC
|
| [reply] |
Re: The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...
by wjw (Priest) on Jul 09, 2015 at 20:17 UTC
|
Everything is other --- other than that which I am working on at the moment. Not very predictable, but the $flexibility = $total_to_do - $what_I_am_working_on Pretty simple....
...the majority is always wrong, and always the last to know about it...
A solution is nothing more than a clearly stated problem...
| [reply] [d/l] |
Re: The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...
by shmem (Chancellor) on Jul 11, 2015 at 18:35 UTC
|
Urgent, important, favour - but favour comes first. Gives me rope to do urgent, then important. But! "important" could be omitted:
Lo urgente no deja tiempo para lo importante. (Mafalda)
perl -le'print map{pack c,($-++?1:13)+ord}split//,ESEL'
| [reply] |
Re: The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...
by Anonymous Monk on Jul 09, 2015 at 14:08 UTC
|
1. What I want to do
2. What I must do
3. Everything else
| [reply] |
Re: The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...
by Pope-O-Matik (Pilgrim) on Jul 22, 2015 at 02:42 UTC
|
| [reply] |
Re: The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...
by Bloodnok (Vicar) on Jul 11, 2015 at 09:48 UTC
|
| [reply] |
Re: The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...
by stm (Initiate) on Jul 21, 2015 at 10:12 UTC
|
Personal ( Health, Development ), Family, Work / Friends.
| [reply] |
Re: The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...
by pvaldes (Chaplain) on Jul 21, 2015 at 22:19 UTC
|
Respiration, digestion and excretion. Curious if we think about it, but it never gets old. | [reply] |
Re: The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ... (just 2)
by tye (Sage) on Oct 07, 2015 at 05:03 UTC
|
sev-1, sev-2, sev-3. Well, that is for outages not really tasks. We don't assign priority values to tasks.
When I've seen priorities assigned to tasks, the practical end results always boiled down to: "interrupt current work to get it done", "do it in the 'next' batch of work", or "never do it". Even though there were often more than 3 levels defined (and that 3rd level doesn't really qualify as a priority anyway).
| [reply] |