Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: RFC: Emulating the monastery voting system

by sundialsvc4 (Abbot)
on Sep 25, 2015 at 03:01 UTC ( #1142971=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: RFC: Emulating the monastery voting system
in thread RFC: Emulating the monastery voting system

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
  • Comment on Re^4: RFC: Emulating the monastery voting system

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: RFC: Emulating the monastery voting system
by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Sep 25, 2015 at 12:25 UTC

    I could tap-dance around it but we're past that. You are completely wrong. All I read when shopping is the bad reviews; to see if any hold water. Good reviews are non-sense, just like upvotes from strangers. There are many persons who *like* kęstur hįkarl. There are Bronies and Juggalos. There are legions of fans of music so stupid, awful, and moronic it boggles anyone who takes music seriously. A five star review is tripe and it might have been paid for to boot. 10,000 Likes for yellowcake is what got Iraq trashed. A system built without a means of dissenting feedback is a system for propaganda and mutual masturbation.

    Your posts have been straying back into positive territory lately because you've been posting more sensible answers. It's not bad stars, it's a reflection of what you put into this place.

      The signal-to-noise ratio is better in the 2-star reviews.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1142971]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (6)
As of 2021-05-13 22:55 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Perl 7 will be out ...





    Results (144 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?